Misleading Information Led to Patent Grant & Subsequent Prior Art Discovery

Misleading Information Led to Patent Grant & Subsequent Prior Art Discovery

In patent disputes, identifying relevant prior art within the invention’s field is crucial for invalidating claims based on misrepresentation.

Client: Braking system manufacturer 

Objective: The case study aimed to support our client, XYZ Innovations, in challenging the validity of ABC Solutions’ patent, which was granted due to misleading information provided by ABC Solutions’ representative during the examination process. 

Case Background:

● ABC Solutions filed a patent in 2019 for a novel vehicle braking system using compressed air. 

● Despite the cited prior art reference, the firm misled the examiner and secured the patent in 2023. 

● XYZ Innovations reviewed their technology and identified ABC Solutions’ patent posed a risk to their product, so they approached us for assistance. 

Want to access the complete case study describing how our seasoned IP professionals gather insights by rigorously analyzing patented technology and related documents to support our client in invalidating ABC Solutions‘ claims? 

Fill out the form to access the comprehensive case study.

    Access Form






    CONNECT With
    our Experts








      "

      "